Over the year the North Pole forms a circle when viewed from above the ecliptic. This graph shows Earth's wobble as seen from above. (See charts and graphs in comment section.)
The axis dots on the graph form a circle and show the years axis tilt variation. This chart shows the wobble, tilt and drift from Earth's normal axis point from 2013 to today.
Earth's path of 2021 is in brown. Earth's path of 2022 is in yellow.
This year we see Earth is making an extremely wide turn in its radius and is at its furthest distance EVER from its normal position from 2013, (its Zero Axis point of 2013).
This wobble, tilt and drift is directly connected to Earth's ongoing magnetic pole reversal, pole shift, failing magnetic field, magnetosphere disturbances, atmospheric compression, jet stream collapse and weather extremes.
___________________________________________
Earth Axis Tilt Chart:
Data plotted on the graph is from the Paris Observatory IERS Centers.
The little black arrows indicate the position of where the x, y pole positions were the years prior on June 22. That's the last day this chart was updated by the previous researcher. Note: "The reason the arrows are on the graph is so we can see the difference in wobble from year to year (the distance to no wobble in the center).
As well as whether the timing on that same day each year forms a straight line to the center (rising and setting at the same place each year) or if the timing of them is ahead or behind each other (rising and setting in a different place each year).
The center that says zero axis wobble does not mean no tilt. The axis itself is tilted and produces the seasons, so even with no wobble we still have seasons. The drift really is the slight variations in the axis which is already tilted and wobbling."
The purpose of this page is to show how to make Colloidal Gold. using an electrolytic process to make gold chloride (AuCl3), and then to reduce the resultant gold chloride to colloidal gold by means of a sugar based reducing agent and sodium citrate stabilizer.
4) Ordinary Corn Syrup. 5) Power supply capable of supplying ordinary house current 110vac 6) common cheap coffee maker 7) Distilled water.
Warning:
If you are not experienced working with electricity, get assistance, or do not perform this procedure. 110vac is lethal.
Stock Solutions:
To make the Sodium Chloride solution, weigh 0.3 grams of table salt, and dissolve it in distilled H20 to make 100 ml of stock solution.
To make our Citrate stock solution, weigh out 1.47 grams of Sodium Citrate and dissolve it in distilled H2O to make 100 ml of stock solution.
The Electrodes:
For the electrodes use .999 pure gold ribbon. IONS flow best off sharp edges and points. ANY gold will work but ribbon works best.
Power Supply:
The power supply should be able to supply ordinary house current of 110vac. literally all that's needed is two wires with a house plug on one end and alligator clips on the other.
There is a minimum voltage for the process to work, based on the electrochemical series. It is only about 30 volts.
MAKE CERTAIN that you plug in the electricity LAST and NEVER TOUCH THE DEVICE WHILE IT IS ENERGIZED.
i prefer to put a SWITCH in the circuit just for added safety.
The Process:
Arrange the apparatus so that the carife is on the hotplate. Add 250ml of distilled water to the coffee maker.
Suspend the electrodes in the carife and bring the water to a boil. Leave the power supply off. i simply bend the elements over the edge of the carife.
With the power supply turned off, connect the gold electrodes to the supply terminals, Make sure that there are no short circuits, and that there is no exposed wiring which could cause a high voltage shock. Do not power it up yet.
Bring water to a boil.
add 15 ml ( 3tsp ) of stock table salt solution to the beaker. stir . i use a swizzle stick or a chop stick. non-conducting material just to be safe.
Add 2 drops syrup to the beaker Or about the amount picked up by immersing the end of a chopstick 1/4 inch into the syrup and letting the excess drip off.
Add 5 ml ( 1tsp ) of the stock Sodium Citrate solution to the beaker.
turn on the power source
Within minutes, a red tint should start to appear.
When the desired color depth is produced, or no more color change is detected, turn off the power first, then remove the electrodes. Top off the water to restore it to 250ml. You should now have red colloidal gold. Filter, and bottle.
Half Reactions:
Cathode:
6NaCl + 6e --> 6Na +6Cl- Chloride ion travels to Anode where it combines with gold 6Na + 6H20 --> 6NaOH +3H2 (which bubbles off as hydrogen gas) 6NaOH --> 6Na+ +6OH- New hydroxyls journey to anode continuing electrolysis of water. Au+++ +3e --> Au We don't want this to happen as it merely produces gold sludge on the cathode 4H20 +4e --> 2H2 + 4OH- This reaction may not happen because of the preference to electrolyze the potassium
Anode:
6Cl- --> 3Cl2 + 6e 2Au +3Cl2 --> 2AuCl3 Gold is liberated as gold chloride 4OH- --> O2 + 2H2O + 4e Oxygen gas is liberated as hydroxyl ions are oxidized
Secondary Reactions:
AuCl3 is known to react with the Cl- of the NaCl to produce Chloroauric acid - So - AuCl3 + NaCl +H2O --> HAuCl4 +NaOH
While the spacing between the electrodes does not affect the reactions, it does alter the amount of voltage needed from the power supply to produce a fixed amount of current. The closer the electrodes are, the lower the voltage needed. However, closer electrodes are detrimental in that the gold ions have less distance to travel before contacting the negative electrode. Any gold ion that contacts the negative electrode is wasted. We wish the gold ions to encounter and react with the citrate or peroxide reducing agents before touching the cathode. Therefore higher voltage is beneficial in that it allows the electrodes to be spaced farther apart while maintaining a reasonable electrical current. that is why i use 110vac. not only does it afford more rapid making but also emmits from BOTH elements.
Actual voltage is inconsequential to the electrochemistry. What matters is current (amperes). (See Faraday's Laws) As you can see from the half reactions, it takes 3 electrons to liberate 1 atom of metallic gold. Additional electrons are required for the inevitable electrolysis of water.
As the Au+++ ions enter solution, they migrate to and are pulled to the cathode because of the electric field between the electrodes. If the Au ions reach the cathode, they will be reduced back to metallic gold, which is not what we want. (This is the basic electroplating mechanism). By adding the reducing agents (Corn Syrup, and Na-Citrate) at the start of electrolysis, the Au ions have a high probability of finding a molecule of the reducing agent before reaching the cathode. When this happens, the ionic charge is neutralized, and free metallic gold appears in the solution instead of on the cathode. However, a small amount of the Au ions may be reduced at the cathode, causing some loss gold particles.
Note that the sodium atoms are essentially trapped at the cathode. As soon as they are reduced to sodium metal, they immediately react with water to again produce sodium hydroxide which immediately ionizes, allowing the sodium ion to be reduced to metal and start the cycle all over again. This in turn produces a steady stream of hydroxyl ions moving towards the anode to be turned into oxygen gas and water again. At this point, I do not know how to determine the ratio of the sodium cycle to the gold cycle. A similar occurence seems to happen with the Cl- ion at the anode. As soon as the Cl- reacts with gold to produce AuCl3 it would immediately ionize, again producing Cl- ions attracted to the anode.
The stoichiometry above assumes all of the chlorine will combine with the gold to produce gold chloride. Experimentation shows that is not so. In fact, it is necessary to at least double the amount of NaCl to achieve CG with the color density of a known 50ppm sample produced by reacting commercial gold chloride with citrate per the Turkevich method. Therefore, it must be assumed that the chlorine is sequestered somewhere or it escapes with the oxygen produced at the anode before it can react with the Au.
Cholesterol is a word that strikes fear into the heart. But does it also strike disease? Because here’s the curious thing: having a high cholesterol level is associated with living a longer life, especially if you have heart disease. Confused? Of course you are! Welcome to the cholesterol paradox.
The term “cholesterol paradox” was coined as early as 2006 (if not before), when a study of data collected from 24 countries, involving nearly 11,000 patients with heart disease, found that “Low cholesterol levels were associated with worse prognosis in patients with acute heart failure.”
That was just the start of it. Since then, many studies have been published that discuss this baffling observation, one that has been replicated many times.
Indeed, raised total cholesterol has been shown to be a predictor of survival — in a study of 114 patients with chronic heart failure, the chances of survival increased by 25% for each mmol/l increment in total cholesterol. Similarly, it has been found that most — nearly 75% — of people who are admitted to hospital with heart attack have normal cholesterol levels.
How is it possible to make sense of all this? Easy. Just call it a paradox and ignore the cognitive dissonance.
Nobody argues that cholesterol is essential to life. This fat-like substance, made in the liver, is present in every cell of the body. It is needed to make hormones and to make vitamin D. It is a component of the cell membrane and plays a key role in the immune system. The brain has the highest concentration of cholesterol in the body, where it is involved in nerve transmission and memory recall. So vital is it that the brain makes its own supply.
Drugs designed to reduce cholesterol in the body — statins — are among the most prescribed in the world. In 2019, Atorvastatin was the most widely prescribed drug in both the UK and US.
“The recently presented ACCELERATE trial dumbfounded many experts by failing to demonstrate any cardiovascular benefit of evacetrapib (cholesterol-lowering medication) despite dramatically lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in high-risk patients with coronary disease.”
Unpacking the paradox
One way to decipher this enigma is to talk about “good” and “bad” cholesterol. Yet this too is misleading. There is only one type of cholesterol, and it’s called cholesterol. There are, however, different types of cholesterol transport systems.
Cholesterol is transported around the body by different protein carriers, known as lipoproteins. There are several types, the main ones being high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL).
HDL is assumed to be “good” because it transports cholesterol away from the arteries and to the liver, for disposal.
LDL is assumed to be “bad” because it transports cholesterol from the liver to the rest of the body — including the arteries, where it is a component of arterial plaques. That is why cholesterol is vilified as the enemy of heart health. (Plaques contain, among other things, calcium, but nobody suggests you avoid calcium.)
Arterial plaques can build up, causing narrowing of the arteries and a condition called atherosclerosis. Eventually a clot can break off, blocking flow to the heart and causing a heart attack.
So far, so neat and tidy. It’s only when you delve deeper that it all starts to get rather messy.
Even though LDL is the one with the bad reputation, low levels of LDL are linked to higher overall mortality in patients with heart failure. If you want to survive, you might be better off with high levels of not-so-bad-after-all LDL cholesterol.
Similarly, people with high cholesterol, including high LDL cholesterol, are less likely to have atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is irregular, sometimes rapid heart rhythm, which can cause blood clots in the heart. It also increases the risk of stroke and heart failure.
“This research adds to the body of evidence which suggests an inverse relationship between cholesterol levels and AF — the “cholesterol paradox” for AF.”
It’s all about the ratio…
Lowering LDL cholesterol has no substantial effect on reducing heart attacks or death. Which is not to say that cholesterol doesn’t matter; it does.
The key issue is the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL. This is now considered to be a more important, stronger predictor of heart attack in both men and women, even though “the clinical use of the ratio is often overlooked”.
How do you calculate your ratio? Simple — just divide your total cholesterol figure by your HDL figure. The optimal range is 1.0–4.8. These days test results usually include the all-important ratio. When you next get tested, be sure to ask about this.
…..and the fat
While you’re about it, ensure also that you have your triglycerides measured; triglycerides are a strong risk for cardiovascular disease. Serum triglyceride is the fat circulating in your blood and high levels (over 1.68mmol/L) increase your risk of coronary heart disease and stroke.
Where diet comes in
And here’s another paradox to scramble your brain. Eating saturated fat does not raise blood fat. It does increase both LDL and HDL cholesterol, but without changing the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL.
Despite the lack of evidence to indict it, the fear of saturated fat persists. To resolve this contentious issue once and for all, the Journal of the American College of Cardiology published, in 2020, a thorough, “state-of-the-art” review into the relationship between saturated fat consumption and cardiovascular disease.
The researchers discovered that most analyses and trials found that not only was there no benefit in reducing saturated fat to minimise the risk of cardiovascular disease, it was actually protective against stroke. The conclusion of this review was:
“The recommendation to limit dietary saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake has persisted despite mounting evidence to the contrary.”
So what does increase levels of triglycerides, and therefore risk of heart disease?
The answer is carbohydrate.
The best way to lower your risk of heart disease and early death is to reduce your intake of carbohydrates, especially sugar and refined carbohydrates.
When you eat a low carbohydrate, high fat diet, your triglyceride level goes down. This is exactly what you want. Do the opposite — eat a high carbohydrate, low fat diet — and your blood fat rises and your HDL decreases. That is the effect of insulin, or rather insulin resistance.
Insulin resistance is a pre-diabetic state, where the body is no longer able to respond adequately to all the glucose circulating in the blood.
“…the conventional dietary advice on lowering cholesterol by reducing saturated fat intake is not just wrong, but has also likely worsened the risk of heart disease by fuelling the single most important root cause of coronary artery disease and heart attacks: insulin resistance.” (Dr Aseem Malholtra: A Statin-Free Life.)
A review of the evidence surrounding sugar consumption and its role in the development of coronary heart disease found “relatively consistent evidence” of an association between sugar intake and the risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
“To reduce the burden of CHD, guidelines should focus particularly on reducing intake of concentrated sugars, specifically the fructose-containing sugars like sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup in the form of ultra-processed foods and beverages.”
These are the foods that increase your risk of developing insulin resistance. Diabetic patients are more likely to have coronary atherosclerosis than non-diabetics and more likely to die from heart disease. But even without diabetes, insulin resistance puts you at greater risk.
There are so many “paradoxes” in nutrition that they are becoming the norm. Perhaps you’ve heard of the French paradox — the observation that the French have one of the highest consumption rates of saturated fat in Europe, but a relatively low rate of heart disease.
However you view all these contradictions, something clearly isn’t working, because “The global campaign to lower cholesterol by diet and drugs has failed to thwart the developing pandemic of coronary heart disease around the world.”
Indeed it has. A re-examination of entrenched beliefs about diet, heart disease and longevity is surely long overdue.
As I mention above, cholesterol is essential for brain health. Deficiency is linked to a number of diseases, including dementia.
For years, we have been fed a narrative that a high level of LDL cholesterol is responsible for causing heart disease, and therefore lowering LDL cholesterol to the lowest level possible is a good thing.
The current recommendations are to reduce that number to less than 70 mg/dL. For a report that appeared in the journal Neurology, researchers studied the association between LDL cholesterol and brain bleeding risk. More than 96,000 subjects who had never had a stroke, heart attack, or cancer were studied.
Editor's Note: Dr. Crandall Reveals the Secret to Normal Cholesterol
Averages of LDL cholesterol were correlated to the development of heart disease. Subjects with LDL cholesterol levels of 70 mg/dL to 99 mg/dL had a similar risk of heart disease as those with levels greater than 100 mg/dL.
Those with LDL levels less than 70 mg/dL had a significantly higher risk for developing heart disease than those with LDL levels of 70 mg/dL to 90 mg/dL.
For those with LDL levels of 50 mg/dL to 69 mg/dL, there was a 65% higher risk, and there was a 169% higher risk for those with LDL levels below 50 mg/dL.
I’ve been saying this for years: Using toxic medications to lower cholesterol levels as much as possible does not make sense. This study found a significantly higher risk of brain bleeds when LDL levels are lowered to the recommended ranges.
Statin drugs help about 1% of people who take them. Now we have new cholesterol-lowering medications that target LDL cholesterol receptors. They poison a crucial enzyme which results in a drastically lower LDL cholesterol.
But the side effects of doing this include serious, life-threatening infections, cancer, and now brain bleeds.
As I wrote in my book, “The Statin Disaster,‒ both statins and LDL-lowering medications are fraught with side effects and have poor efficacy.
If your cholesterol levels are too high, it is best to search for a reason why this is occurring and avoid taking toxic medications that simply fail most who take them.
For decades, statins—the most common cholesterol-lowering medications—have been recognized as a lifesaver for those with heart disease. While statins have revolutionized heart health in a positive way, some studies highlight the lesser-known concerns of the medication: energy-sapping, increased diabetes risk, and, for many people, muscle pain.
The Puzzling Link Between Statins and Insulin Resistance
A recent systematic review of 11 epidemiological studies with nearly 47 million participants found associations between statin use and decreased insulin sensitivity, as well as insulin resistance—both significant factors for developing Type 2 diabetes. Additionally, statins were found to reduce glycemic control and elevate fasting glucose levels.
Experts are uncertain about the precise mechanism through which statins might impact insulin resistance, considering their advantages, such as lowering inflammation, decreasing oxidative stress, and enhancing endothelial function—all of which actually improve insulin sensitivity rather than diminish it.
A 2021 study published in the journal Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology also found that statins can increase the risk of Type 2 diabetes, but how was unclear. In weighing the potential risks of statins, however, most researchers and health care professionals still believe them to be more beneficial than harmful.
“It is generally viewed that the strengths of lower cholesterol by a lot outweigh a modest increase in insulin resistance,” Michael Snyder, a genetics professor and chair of the Genetics Department at Stanford University School of Medicine, told The Epoch Times.
But the double-sided nature of statins remains unclear to researchers, added Dr. Snyder, who has coauthored multiple studies investigating the correlation between statin usage and insulin intolerance.
Lifestyle factors like obesity also play a major role in insulin resistance. Insulin resistance is often associated with high body weight, which individuals can reduce to potentially offset statins’ effects, Dr. Snyder said.
Why Do Statins Drain Energy?
Fatigue and muscle pain seem to be common with statin use. A study of over 350 statin users found that 93 percent reported muscle pain and fatigue, while 85 percent reported weakness.
“This is of no surprise because of the well-documented effects that statins have on Coenzyme Q-10 (CoQ10), which is a primary cofactor for mitochondrial function,” Dr. Node Smith, a board-certified naturopathic physician, told The Epoch Times. Mitochondria create energy for the entire body at the cellular level. Therefore, in practical terms, statins can deplete the body’s cellular energy by depleting CoQ10, he added.
A letter to the editor published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology noted that people taking statins who also supplemented with CoQ10 were less likely to experience chronic fatigue.
Dr. Smith said many of his patients who have taken statins long-term have reported experiencing persistent muscle pain, weakness, fatigue, and brain fog. “Some of these patients are avid athletes and simply are confused why they can no longer work out,” he added. “If I see this presentation in someone on a statin medication, I will almost always assume the statin is at least a contributing factor and discuss with the patient its removal and replacement with another therapy.”
Is Vitamin B3 an Alternative to Statins?
Statins are commonly used alongside niacin (vitamin B3), recommended for over 40 years to prevent heart disease due to the vitamin’s positive impact on lipid levels.
Niacin is the most common and effective treatment that replaces statins, according to Dr. Smith. “Of all the pharmaceutical medications I’ve helped people get off of, statins are the easiest, least concerning, and patients typically have the best results with—because it is not uncommon for them to feel almost instantly better.”
Niacin decreases LDL cholesterol, which can build up plaque in arteries when levels are too high. It also increases HDL cholesterol, which absorbs other forms of cholesterol in the bloodstream and carries it back to the liver for removal, according to a clinical trial of over 300 people. Additionally, niacin lowers triglycerides, a type of fat in the blood.
Optimized niacin therapy costs patients $15 to 30 per month and is worth trying before statins, Dr. Smith added.
Studies have found that combining niacin and statins may outperform statins alone. Dr. Smith has observed similar results in his practice, although some studies suggest otherwise.
Niacin fell out of favor due to the side effect of niacin flushing, which produces a slight prickly heat sensation for about 30 minutes and can be quite concerning and uncomfortable for some people, he said.
About 15 years ago, wax-coated niacin tablets were developed. They allow high doses of niacin to be delivered while reducing flushing for most people, according to Dr. Smith. Side-effect management methods like taking niacin with food or baking soda can also help.
However, Dr. Smith cautioned that people with familial hypercholesterolemia, a genetic disorder, may need more aggressive therapies, potentially including statins.
Emerging statistics paint an alarming picture – far more have died after the rollout of this ‘super potion’ than during the height of the COVID pandemic in 2020. Yet the mainstream media are desperately trying to divert your attention from this elephant in the room.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Emerging statistics on excess mortality rates paint an alarming picture. Far more people died in 2021, after the rollout of the COVID shots, and in 2022, than during the height of the COVID pandemic in 2020
Mainstream media are trying to divert your attention from the elephant in the room — mass injection with experimental gene transfer technology — to anything and everything but that
The Telegraph blames the unexplained excess deaths on lockdown effects. Many didn’t have access to routine medical care during lockdowns, and are now dying from chronic diseases that went untreated
U.K. Office for National Statistics (ONS) data released August 16, 2022, show excess deaths in England and Wales were, as of August 5, 14.4% higher than the five-year average, which works out to 1,350 more deaths per week than normal. A majority of these excess deaths were cardiovascular in nature — a primary adverse effect of the COVID jabs
In the U.S., we lost 349,000 younger Americans to something besides COVID and non-natural death between April 3, 2021 and August 13, 2022, and that’s not counting the tens of thousands of death records that the CDC has inexplicably deleted. As much as 15% to 25% of the death reports that could indicate a COVID jab death are missing. Other data show that during the fall of 2021, Millennials, aged 25 to 44, had an 84% increase in excess deaths
Emerging statistics on excess mortality rates paint an alarming picture. Far more people died in 2021, after the rollout of the COVID shots, and in 2022, than during the height of the COVID pandemic in 2020. I will review some of those shocking statistics — which are mirrored around the world — in a moment.
But while rational people look at these figures and ask themselves what the most apparent and likely cause behind this sudden rise in deaths of working-age adults and younger people might be, mainstream media are trying to divert your attention from the elephant in the room — mass injection with experimental gene transfer technology — to anything and everything but that.
Lockdowns Blamed for Excess Deaths
In an August 18, 2022, article,1 Telegraph science editor Sarah Knapton blames the “unexplained excess deaths” on “the effects of lockdown.” She writes:2
“Figures for excess deaths from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that around 1,000 more people than usual are currently dying each week from conditions other than the virus.
The … Department of Health has ordered an investigation into the figures amid concern that the deaths are linked to delays to and deferment of treatment for conditions such as cancer, diabetes and heart disease. Over the past two months, the number of excess deaths not from Covid dwarfs the number linked to the virus …
Dr. Charles Levinson, the chief executive of Doctorcall, a private GP service, said his company was seeing ‘far too many’ cases of undetected cancers and cardiac problems, as well as ‘disturbing’ numbers of mental health conditions.
‘Hundreds and hundreds of people dying every week — what is going on?’ he said. ‘Delays in seeking and receiving healthcare are no doubt the driving force, in my view.’”
Cardiovascular Problems Kill in Record Numbers
ONS data released August 16, 2022, show excess deaths in England and Wales were, as of August 5, 14.4% higher than the five-year average, which works out to 1,350 more deaths per week than normal, Knapton reports.3 As you can see in the graph4 below, COVID is only involved in a small number of those deaths.
In all, non-COVID deaths are now more than three times that of COVID-related deaths. According to the U.K. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, a majority of these excess deaths were “preventable heart and stroke and diabetes-related conditions.”
However, while lack of routine health care — people avoiding seeing their doctors for fear of COVID or due to various restrictions — may well have played a role, cardiovascular problems such as heart attacks and strokes are the primary side effects of the jab as well.
A Look at US Mortality Data
The identical trend is also seen in the U.S. In Part 1 of a three-part series,5 The Ethical Skeptic — self-described as a former intelligence officer and strategies for nations facing corruption challenges — reviews data from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics showing “stark increase trends beginning in the first week of April 2021.”
“This date of inception is no coincidence, in that it also happens to coincide with a key inflection point regarding a specific body-system intervention in most of the U.S. population,” The Ethical Skeptic notes.
He describes how, at the very end of May 2021, an “odd signal” developed in his COVID tracking models. This odd signal came in the form of an ICD death code (International Classification of Diseases code) called R00-R99, which stands for “Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified.” In other words, deaths from undetermined causes.
As a result of this odd signal, he started tracking these R00-R99 deaths, along with 11 other ICD-10 (the 10 stands for 10th revision, which is the most recent), such as suicides and overdoses, as well as a statistic called “Excess non-COVID natural cause deaths.” The data The Ethical Skeptic used for his models were derived from three primary databases:
The U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Weekly Counts of Deaths by State and Select Causes, 2014-20196
The CDC’s Weekly Provisional Counts of Deaths by State and Select Causes, 2020-20227
The CDC’s Wonder: Provisional Mortality Statistics, 2018 through Last Month – Query by Constraint Engine8
CDC Is Scrubbing Death Records
Non-COVID mortality saw a mild uptick in October 2020, an effect The Ethical Skeptic attributes to “the systemic damage which the SARS-CoV-2 infection and virus spike protein can produce in the human body. An erstwhile COVID delayed death if you will.”
The noticeable explosion of non-COVID deaths didn’t occur until Week 14, 2021, and “by the end of 2021 it had become abundantly clear that U.S. citizens were not just dying of COVID-19 to the excess, they were also now dying of something else, and at a rate which eventually became higher than that of COVID itself,” he writes.
Disturbingly, he discovered that death records were inexplicably being redacted and deleted during a very crucial time period — Weeks 4 through 20 in 2022. “It is hard to envision a scenario explaining this 52,000-record data tampering across the most at-risk weeks … of 2022, as not constituting malicious obfuscation of U.S. citizen mortality data,” he writes.
Deep Dive Into US Death Statistics
His article is chockfull of charts for those who want to take a deeper dive into the statistics, but here are some extracts of his findings:
“The charts of particular concern … include the charts featuring stark post MMWR Week 14, 2021 rises in mortality. Specifically, they are
Excess non-COVID natural cause, 5+ sigma
Cancer and lymphomas, 9+ sigma
Other respiratory conditions, 2 sigma
Nephritis/Nephrotic syndrome, 4 sigma
Septicemia, 2 sigma
Heart diseases and ailments, 2 sigma
All other ICD-10 tracked natural cause deaths, 4 sigma
… While there are indeed increases in deaths incumbent inside the other ICD-10 codes, those increases appeared to plausibly conform to their same arrival patterns for 2020 as well. In other words, they appeared to be heavily Covid-related in their dynamics, both before and after the Week 14 2021 inflection.
Of particular concern, are those deaths which relate to body-wide regulatory systems as opposed to specific organs or causes. In other words, cancer and lymphomas, heart, autonomous myocarditis/pericarditis/conductive disorders, injuries to the liver and kidneys, etc.
These are not only the canaries in the coal mine in terms of pathology, but may serve to indicate as well that a pervasive systemic disruption is at play inside the average U.S. citizen human physiology, especially over the last 71 weeks. These are the death groups which exhibit the most stark trend of increase post MMWR Week 14, 2021 …
[Let] us for a moment also review the compelling rationale behind the MMWR Week 14 2021 inflection date. This date is a critical matter of concern for no small reason. Its derivation is no coincidence. The ‘Doses and Deaths Comparison Chart’, Exhibit B below, outlines why.
Exhibit B — The MMWR Week 14, 2021 inflection date also happens to correspond to the fastest velocity in administered vaccine doses inside the U.S. population. The red line is Excess Non-COVID Natural Cause Mortality extracted from the data behind Exhibit E below.”
According to The Ethical Skeptic, three types of death record codes in particular are signaling “population-wide systemic health disruption,” and those are: “Excess malignant neoplasm and lymphoma” deaths (coded C00-C97), “Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified” deaths (R00-R99) and “Excess non-COVID natural cause” deaths. All three trend very sharply against historical baselines.
For example, cancer and lymphoma deaths are now at a 9+ Sigma level, although it could potentially be higher. According to The Ethical Skeptic, 43,935 death records relating to “potential myocarditis, cancer, pericarditis, conductive, nephrosis, liver, and/or lymphoma deaths” have been removed from the CDC data sets, and as of his writing of that article had not been put back in or reassigned to another ICD code.
“That is 7% of the total deaths for the period in question, and possibly 15 to 25% of these highly concerning death ICD-10 groups’ trend data — missing. Even absent this data however, the entailed trends are alarming,” he writes.9
US Excess Non-COVID Natural Cause Deaths
The Ethical Skeptic continues:10
“Finally, we end with the most important chart of all — the chart which indicates deaths which are not from accidents, suicide, addiction, assault, abuse, despair, disruption, nor COVID-19. The Excess Non-COVID Natural Cause Mortality chart which we began monitoring on May 29th 2021. What I called then, the ‘What the hell is this?’ chart.
As one can see, we have lost 349,000 younger Americans to something besides COVID and non-natural death, during the period from 3 April 2021 to 13 August 2022.
The current rate of mortality in this ICD categorization, is around 5,000 – 8,000 per week … which exceeds most weeks of the COVID pandemic itself (save for the absolute peak periods). By now, if all these mortality excesses were indeed a holdover from COVID-19 itself, they should have already begun to tail off. Unfortunately, they are not only not tailing off, in many cases they are still increasing.
Exhibit E — Excess Non-COVID Natural Cause Deaths are at an all time high as of MMWR Week 32 of 2022. 349,000 U.S. citizens have died of some additional factor since MMWR Week 14 of 2021. The current rate of excess mortality represents a five-week average of 5+ sigma in excess (hedging conservatively for lag).
Accordingly, and without a shadow of a doubt, we have established that right now there exists a problem in terms of U.S. citizen health and mortality. One which is differentiated from COVID-19 itself, and began in earnest MMWR Week 14 of 2021.”
COVID Jabs Impair Immune Function
Kenji Yamamoto with the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at the Okamura Memorial Hospital in Japan has also sounded the alarm, specifically highlighting the COVID jabs’ ability to impair your immune function. In a commentary published in the Virology Journal June 5, 2022, Yamamoto noted:11
“Recently, The Lancet published a study12 on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals …
The decrease in immunity can be caused by several factors such as N1-methylpseudouridine, the spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, antibody-dependent enhancement, and the original antigenic stimulus …
As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued. In addition, the date of vaccination should be recorded in the medical record of patients … In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination is a major risk factor for infections in critically ill patients.”
It’s important to understand that when your immune function is impaired, you become vulnerable to all kinds of infections and disease, including cancer. As such, the COVID jab may well be responsible for any number of diseases resulting in death.
A Not-so-Comforting Fact Check by Reuters
A recent Thai study13 found teenagers, aged 13 through 18, who received two doses of Pfizer’s mRNA jab suffered a variety of heart problems. A Reuters “fact check” notes:14
“A study of 301 teens in Thailand found mild and temporary heart rhythm changes after a second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among one in six teenagers, not one-third as social media posts claim. The study also saw possible signs of heart inflammation in just seven of those teens with rhythm changes and confirmed myocarditis in only one of the seven.”
Should we throw a victory parade over the fact that the jab causes heart problems in JUST 1 in 6 teens? Really?! Whether it’s 1 in 3 or 1 in 6, this is not “good news” and surely not worthy of the dismissive tone used by Reuters. As reported directly from the study in question:15
“The most common cardiovascular effects were tachycardia (7.64%), shortness of breath (6.64%), palpitation (4.32%), chest pain (4.32%), and hypertension (3.99%). Seven participants (2.33%) exhibited at least one elevated cardiac biomarker or positive lab assessments.
Cardiovascular effects were found in 29.24% of patients, ranging from tachycardia, palpitation, and myopericarditis. Myopericarditis was confirmed in one patient after vaccination. Two patients had suspected pericarditis and four patients had suspected subclinical myocarditis. Conclusion: Cardiovascular effects in adolescents after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination included tachycardia, palpitation, and myocarditis.”
Millennials Died at Staggering Rates in Late 2021
I recently interviewed Ed Dowd, a former equity portfolio manager for BlackRock and hedge fund “guru,”16 but have not yet posted it. In early March 2022 he shared disturbing CDC mortality statistics by age group on Steve Bannon’s War Room.17
During the fall of 2021, Millennials, aged 25 to 44, had an 84% increase in excess mortality. “It’s the worst-ever excess mortality, I think, in history,” Dowd told Bannon. Between the summer and fall of 2021, 61,000 Millennials died who otherwise wouldn’t. To quote Dowd:18
“Basically, Millennials experienced a Vietnam War in the second half of 2021. 58,000 people died in the Vietnam War, U.S. troops [over the course of 10 years], so this generation just experienced a Vietnam War [in 6 months] …
We’ve had 1.1 million excess deaths since the pandemic began, many of which occurred in the second half of [2021] …
I think this is the smoking gun: that the vaccines are causing excess mortality in all age groups … So, I’m going to put a word out there. It’s an old word but it should be re-introduced into the conversation. It’s called democide: Death by government. So the government, through the mandates has killed people …
If you’re on Wall Street and you still think Pfizer and Moderna are good buys, I’ve got news for you: there’s some catalysts coming that are probably not going to be good for holding those stocks.”
The following pdf was posted on Dowd’s GETTR account, March 11, 2022.19 (A GETTR user called MiloMac also reproduced Dowd’s findings using public CDC data, creating additional graphs.20)
The Elephant in the Room
In a March 15, 2022, commentary and follow-up on Dowd’s revelations, Steve Kirsch wrote:21
“I called Ed to clarify where he got the chart and then looked for verification of this. I found the verification. Then I verified that the deaths couldn’t be explained by the COVID delta variant. OK, so what caused all the deaths? The only explanation is the vaccine because the deaths are so massive.”
Kirsch posted a WhatsApp conversation with Marc Girardot, a French-American biotech innovator, who believes the COVID jab may, in some people, age their arteries by as much as 50 years in just a few months. If true, that could certainly trigger rapid onset of cardiovascular disease leading to early death.
Teens and Young Adults Die at Higher Rates in New Zealand
In an August 16, 2022, Substack article,22 independent journalist Alex Berenson (a former New York Times reporter and novelist) highlighted COVID jab statistics from New Zealand,23 which includes observed post-jab deaths. He explained:
“New Zealand’s Ministry of Health publishes regular and detailed reports on COVID vaccine safety, including specific lists of adverse events it has received. As part of the reports, the ministry also counts all deaths of people who have received the jabs in the previous 21 days …
New Zealand has a national COVID immunization registry and a national death registry, so the records and matching should largely be accurate … The ministry breaks down the deaths by age, ranging from 0-9 through over 80.
It then compares the actual number of people who died in the three weeks after the shots to the ‘expected’ number. That figure is simply the number of deaths demographers would have expected over a random three-week period based on actuarial tables estimating mortality …”
In summary, between February 19 and April 30, 2022, people over the age of 30 had lower than normal death rates in the 21 days’ post-jab, but people younger than 30 (ages 10 to 29) for some reason died at higher rates. (The lack of observed deaths in the under-10 age group is likely due to reporting lag.)
According to the health ministry, the slightly elevated deaths in the under-30 group is likely due to “chance.” And as noted by Berenson, “the ministry does not provide any information on the causes of death in any age range, so it is impossible to determine whether myocarditis or other cardiac conditions played a major role in the higher-than-expected figures.”
While these data are nowhere near as alarming as some others, it’s still a red flag that something odd is happening. Young people who should have decades of life left are dying.
And it’s worth noting that New Zealand, just like the U.S. claims there are NO potential safety issues with the jabs — not a single one — despite thousands of serious injury reports.24 Considering the age group that is dying at a higher than normal rate — teenagers and young adults in their 20s — even a small increase ought to be taken very seriously, but is not.
To end where we started, which is the more likely culprit in these deaths? Past lockdowns temporarily preventing routine medical care, resulting in chronic diseases that kill even young people within a couple of years? Or the mass injection of experimental gene transfer shots that have never been used in humans before?
Originally published September 02, 2022, on Mercola.com
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Epoch Health welcomes professional discussion and friendly debate. To submit an opinion piece, please follow these guidelines and submit through our form here.
Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder of Mercola.com. An osteopathic physician, best-selling author, and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, his primary vision is to change the modern health paradigm by providing people with a valuable resource to help them take control of their health.
OFF THE CHART AGAIN - POLE SHIFT WARNING 
